Amazon Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

Belgian MNO tries app-specific zero rating - bad idea in my view

Posted on 04:10 by Unknown
Mobistar in Belgium has started offering a plan which gives users zero-rated Facebook, Twitter and Netlog (a local social network), as well as free access to its own mobistar.be domain. (These sites are actually fair-use capped at 1GB data per month).

[Hat-tip for this to Samira Zafar who mentioned it on one of LinkedIn's discussion forums on Net Neutrality]

Details are at http://www.mobistar.be/fr/offre/mobile/cartes-rechargeables/tempotribe

I think that this will backfire spectacularly on the company. Their terms & conditions (run through Google Translate) says:

Unlimited surfing on Facebook, Twitter and Netlog is only valid in Belgium and corresponds to a volume of 1 GB maximum.

Surfing is for free surfing on mobile sites official Facebook, Netlog and Twitter for:

• Mobistar's mobile portal (m.mobistar.be)
• The official URL such as http://m.facebook.com , http://m.netlog.be , http://mobile.twitter.com
• applications of these official sites

The unofficial applications are not included in this option.

Links, pictures and content to external URLs has Facebook, Twitter and Netlog will be charged at the normal rate of a session Mobile Mail & Surf.

So in other words, if you use the Facebook app, and a friend links to a web-page or video which renders *inside the app* (ie with the blue banner still across the top), then you get charged extra. For me and I expect many other user's, that's part of the experience of using Facebook. Not only that, but in Facebook (certainly on the iPhone app) you don't always know if someone is sharing something on-site (eg a group page or note or picture) or off-site.



Furthermore, Facebook is now allowing its own-hosted videos to play inside the app - so where does that fit? And what happens when Facebook updates the app with new features (let's say, proxying bits of the web through itself)? Especially if it's only on some OS's, or some updated versions? Or if FB decides to route bits of its own content (pictures, lets say) through a new CDN with a different set of URLs? There are so many potential "gotchas" here it's amazing.

Then there's this official / unofficial app business. I seem to recall that Twitter has acquired half the "unofficial" apps like Tweetdeck, so presumably they are now official? Or not? Who knows? Then there's the chance that twitter.com gets fired up in the browser rather than an app (perhaps because there's a link in an email) and it defaults to the PC version rather than m.twitter .


I also have my doubts that the Belgian representatives of Facebook and Twitter (if they're actively being involved) are privy to new and upcoming features, or changes in the way the apps work - let's say, adding HTTPS encryption, for example. The list of hiccups and chances for both false-positives and false-negatives is huge.

Never mind Net Neutrality (which is a separate & legitimate concern here as well), this is an absolute minefield for confusion, poor customer service & complaints.


Could be an interesting case-study though - let's watch the outcome. 

[Speaking of case-studies, this post is another one. I'm not linking it to Twitter, but only driving it via LinkedIn and native / email-subscribers of this blog. The main objective is to divert the flow of people away from Twitter followers to more direct engagement with me via email or LinkedIn. Ultimately, I want to delete my Twitter account, and this is part of the migration process].










Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Quick musing on Cloud Computing
    I just heard the phrase "Everything as a Service" during a presentation on Cloud, SaaS and other forms of managed service offering...
  • Apple, embedded SIMs, NFC and mobile payments - some speculation
    I wonder if I've just managed to join up the dots on something rather important: - Recent reports suggest that Apple is intending to use...
  • New Cisco VNI traffic report out
    One of the broadband industry's "bibles" has been published in a 2010 edition . Cisco's "Visual Networking Index...
  • Is the MID a market?
    MIDs (Mobile Internet Devices) are being pushed by some notebook OEMs and silicon suppliers as the next big convergent handheld category. I...
  • "You can't use my eyeballs for free"
    Let's look forward 10 years. We've all got augmented reality browsers on our handsets, or perhaps our 4G-connected sunglasses. They ...
  • Mobile traffic management - the Inter-technology war begins
    I've been following the proliferation of mobile broadband traffic management technologies for some considerable time now, having publish...
  • Pre-MWC notes for analyst relations staff
    OK, it's the time of the year when I get bombarded by emails and phone calls from a million people inviting me to briefings and similar ...
  • Mobile operators' future voice strategies decoded
    Apologies in advance, but this blog post is deliberately a bit of a tease. I'm not going to spell out the answer here, as it's too v...
  • Hosted mobile services in the recession - Caveat Emptor
    I used to work as an equity analyst at an investment bank back in 2000-2001. I remember an unending stream of first generation Application S...
  • Challenges in measuring offload volumes
    I suspect we're going to get bombarded with statistics in the next year, along the lines of "Operator X deployed Vendor Y's off...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (31)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (46)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2011 (73)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ▼  November (10)
      • Controlling telephony IN and supplementary feature...
      • The top 10 assumptions the telecoms industry makes...
      • European Court of Justice ruling on ISP filtering ...
      • My thoughts on Ofcom's Net Neutrality statement
      • Mobile video optimisation - different perspectives
      • Another reason why application-based charging for ...
      • Operator fear & control over WiFi tethering is onl...
      • The smoking gun - I think O2 UK has FALLING mobile...
      • Has mobile data growth flattened off? Are caps & t...
      • Belgian MNO tries app-specific zero rating - bad i...
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2010 (130)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2009 (126)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2008 (94)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (19)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile