Amazon Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 11 November 2010

Will there be legal pitfalls of policy management?

Posted on 06:25 by Unknown
It's a common enough theme that you should never post anything on a social network or web forum, that you couldn't deal with being openly available. We all know that security breaks down, APIs are opened up, privacy rules change.

But do people take that seriously enough in the offline world? Increasingly, secrets and dubious behaviour get revealed. The UK government suffered a huge scandal over the leaking of questionable MP's expenses claims last year. It resulted in resignations, arrests and helped to put the last administration out of power. A number of parliamentarians are now facing criminal charges.

Various other examples abound of businesses wilfully hiding the true facts behind their actions, mis-selling products or actually committing fraud. The true facts might come out years later, but authorities are often prepared to find the executives responsible. US companies' chiefs are bound by Sarbanes-Oxley rules as well.

So the question I have is whether all those tasked with implementing network policies really think through the ramifications of their actions? Are all decisions cross-checked with what has actually been sold to customers, or how it was marketed? Yes, there are often woolly clauses in contracts about operators being able to do necessary management... but would these stand up in court, if some actions appear to go beyond what is strictly "necessary"?

And at what point do any "secret" policies (eg degrading a competitor's services or applications) step over the line to being anti-competitive or fraudulent? Forget about simple abuse of Net Neutrality laws, which can obviously be debated & appealed until we're blue in the face. This is about actually lying to customers: hard-and-fast concerns in terms of consumer protection, for which the law tends to have big & pointy teeth.

I'm not a lawyer, so I don't really have a clear view. But then neither are many of the people actually *implementing* the business rules and policies at a network level.

I've never met anyone with a business card title of "Network policy manager", who understands everything from the operations of the network, to the customer's viewpoint, to the nitty-gritty of sales and marketing, to various angles of regulation, to competition and contract law.

If telcos or their vendors think they can "get away with" dubious policies that are not made transparent, they may get a nasty surprise some time in the future. Sooner or later policies will get leaked, or reverse engineered. Normal ups & downs of network performance will look like "white noise". Any unnatural patterns (by user, by app, by location, by time, by device, by OS etc) will stand out a mile, correlated with the right software and enough processing clout. Then someone will do a compare & contrast with the details of what they've been sold - and if there are material differences, trouble is likely.

Bottom line: don't enforce any network policies you wouldn't like to see published on the web tomorrow.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The Number 1 problem for "seamless" models of WiFi offload / network selection
    I frequently argue against the assumption that "seamless" connection to WiFi is practical or desirable, especially for the general...
  • Mobile social networking - how I'll know when it's going mainstream....
    This falls into the category of "amusing personal anecdotes" rather than "rigorous industry analysis". But it also refle...
  • Part of Nokia's problem - making Ovi compelling
    I've got a Nokia Ovi account somewhere. Signed up for it ages ago, to play around with the Ovi Store when I had an N97 to play with, ba...
  • Putting a value on customer data with reference to offload
    There continues to be a ferocious discussion about AT&T's new data plans - and also, as I commented a couple of weeks ago, about the...
  • Android - the retail experience
    I just stopped off at my local branch of Carphone Warehouse on a whim, to have a quick look at what's being sold and how. (By coincidenc...
  • For telcos, "Monetising OTT" is about distribution partnerships & revshare, not QoS or termination fees
    A couple of years ago, I moderated a panel session at a conference on broadband business models and "traffic management". It was o...
  • BT WiFi smartphone application
    I've just seen BT's announcement of its new iPhone and Android app, offering free WiFi access at its Openzone and FON hotspots to i...
  • An update on @DApremium - the world's first paid Twitter channel. Now available with quarterly or annual subscriptions
    It's now been six weeks since I announced the launch of @DApremium , my second Twitter stream - one which is available only to paid subs...
  • The Novatel MiFi - possibilities for new mobile broadband business models
    OK, I realise that I've been a bit grumpy and critical of some things recently. But before everyone assumes I'm getting more cantank...
  • There really needs to be a "User tariff API" for developers
    Generally speaking, app developers and website owners know what device you've got, what OS, and what browser. Furthermore, they know wha...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (31)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (46)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (73)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2010 (130)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ▼  November (10)
      • Will advertisers be made to pay for mobile data use?
      • The SIM card. The single point of failure for the ...
      • Apple, embedded SIMs, NFC and mobile payments - so...
      • Enforcing traffic management transparency
      • Wallets don't crash
      • Three new white papers on Mobile Broadband Traffic...
      • Part of Nokia's problem - making Ovi compelling
      • Will there be legal pitfalls of policy management?
      • Mobile operators have lost their chance at owning ...
      • What impact will security worries have on WiFi off...
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2009 (126)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2008 (94)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (19)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile